Pappers MCP: client monitoring and wealth intelligence

Via Pappers, run risk monitoring on the following companies
held in my clients' portfolios: [list of company names or SIRENs].

For each company:
(1) Is there any opened or ongoing insolvency procedure?
(2) BODACC publications over the last 12 months: pledges, disposals, capital changes, management changes.
(3) Were annual accounts filed within legal deadlines?
(4) Any changes in directors or beneficial owners over 12 months?
(5) Summary: Green / Orange / Red status with justification.
For Orange and Red statuses: recommended action and concerned client.

Via Pappers, monitor recent events related to the following
companies over the past 6 months: [list].

For each company, identify:
(1) Capital changes or ownership structure changes.
(2) New executive mandates or departures.
(3) New related entities (holdings, property companies, subsidiaries).
(4) Registry filings suggesting an ongoing operation.
(5) The most significant event for the client's wealth situation.
For each detected event: what conversation should it trigger?

Via Pappers, prepare my follow-up meeting with [client name],
executive of [company / SIREN].

Provide:
(1) Financial changes since the latest available fiscal year: revenue, net result, equity.
(2) Recent events: BODACC publications, statutory changes, new mandates.
(3) Changes in ownership structure over 12 months.
(4) Potential risk signals to address first.
(5) Changes across other identified entities: companies, property entities, holdings.
(6) Three wealth topics this analysis suggests opening during the meeting.

Via Pappers, run a KYC review on [name / SIREN] as part of
my periodic AML due diligence obligations.

Structure the analysis in six parts:
(1) Updated identification: legal form, share capital, registered office, current executives.
(2) Beneficial owners: names, ownership percentages, changes since last review.
(3) PEP and sanctions screening: alerts detected or not for each identified person.
(4) BODACC publications over the last 24 months: significant events.
(5) AML risk evolution since last review: stable, up, or down.
(6) Supporting documents to request if risk level has changed.

Via Pappers, analyze recent changes in [client name]'s
wealth profile through identifiable entities.

(1) Newly created entities or entities where the client appears as executive or shareholder.
(2) Recent real estate acquisitions identifiable through DVF.
(3) New mandates in third-party companies.
(4) Changes in existing entities suggesting ongoing operations.
(5) Identify wealth topics not yet covered in the current advisory relationship.

Via Pappers, analyze [name / SIREN] for a potential transmission
in three to five years. The executive is my client.

(1) Valuation analysis: revenue and EBITDA over five years, sector multiple, estimated transfer range, net debt.
(2) Current ownership structure: holdings, existing holding company, possible split ownership, other shareholders.
(3) Mapping of the executive's other entities: companies, participations, property entities.
(4) Red flags: disputes, pledges, or proceedings that could impact valuation.
(5) Three transmission schemes to assess based on the case, with eligibility conditions.

Via Pappers, query the DVF database for [address or municipality].
My client declares an asset in this area valued at [declared amount].

(1) Recent comparable transactions: area, price per square meter, date.
(2) Realistic valuation range for an asset of [surface] m² in this area.
(3) Potential gap between declared value and market value.
(4) Identifiable transactions under the client's name or known entities.